This poor chap has been violated. Police raided his home and found a crossbow, nunchakas, stolen equipment including an NEC data projector, TV, video, digital cameras, cannabis and amphetamines.
So he has been convicted of weapons offences, drug offences, and stolen goods offences. And the sentence? A 12 month bond. Twelve whole months where he is now expected to obey the law. A whole twelve months. What if he can’t manage it? I suppose a further few months on top might do the trick…
The convicted law breaker described the experience of the raid as a ‘traumatic intrusion on his life’. WTF ?
Well sorry Kyle. Perhaps if you hadn’t flogged all that stuff, got into drugs, and obtained banned weapons, maybe police would have no reason to raid ‘your’ house. Purely speculation here, but is it even your house? Isn’t that a department of housing estate? What about the ‘traumatic intrusion’ felt by the victims of your crimes? Hours of work for businesses securing equipment? Police having to come into their place of business or home to fingerprint in order to catch you?
What really gets to me in all this is the insistence of media to distinguish this man as a ‘Father’. So what? That makes no difference. He did the crime. His kids would be better off without him. Why does the fact that this ‘welfare recipient’ is caring for three children have ANY bearing on the case?
Just goes to prove, criminals don’t give a stuff about the victims of their crimes. The only person that matters is themselves.
0 responses so far ↓
There are no comments yet...Kick things off by filling out the form below.
Leave a Comment